Republic v District Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer (DLASO) Tigania East Subcounty Exparte Solomon Kubai Mugwika; Peter Kaburuto Kinathi (Interested Party) [2020] eKLR

Court
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
Hon. Lucy N. Mbugua
Judgment Date
September 16, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
3

REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MERU
JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR ORDERS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDER OF CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 8 AND 9 OF THE LAW REFORM ACT CAP 26 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE ORDER 53 RULE 1 AND 2 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
AND
IN THE MATTER OF OBJECTION NUMBER 3586 FOR THE LAND PARCEL NO. 187 & 15454 IN KARAMA ADJUDICATION SECTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCEL NO. 187 AND 15454 KARAMA ADJUDICATION SECTION
REPUBLIC.............................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
THE DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION AND SETTLEMENT
OFFICER (DLASO) TIGANIA EAST SUBCOUNTY........................RESPONDENT
AND
PETER KABURUTO KINATHI.............................................. INTERESTED PARTY
SOLOMON KUBAI MUGWIKA.......................................EXPARTE APPLICANT

JUDGMENT
1. On 1/7/2019 the ex-parte applicant a filed chamber summons seeking leave to apply for Judicial Review orders of certiorari quashing the decision and/award of the respondent in Objection Number 3586 of Karama Adjudication Section as the same was reached in breach of the rules of natural justice, and an order of prohibition stopping the respondent and interested party from implementing the decision of the respondent delivered on 8/3/2019 in regard to land parcel no. 187 and 15454 Karama Adjudication Section. The applicant also prayed that leave so granted do operate as a stay of the aforementioned decision. He also sought for costs.
2. The chamber summons application was allowed on 17.7.2019, of which the exparte applicant was to file and serve the substantive motion within 21 days. It appears that this order was not complied with. In his submissions, the exparte applicant contends that he presented the substantive motion on 26.9.2019. However, no such application can be found in the court file. What was filed by the exparte applicant is the statement of facts and the verifying affidavit. In any event any application presented after the date of 7.8.2019 (the 21 days period from 17.7.2019) would be in contravention to the provisions of order 53 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
3. In the final analysis, I find that there is no suit before me for determination. This matter is therefore dismissed with costs to the interested party.

DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2020
HON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE

ORDER
The date of delivery of this Judgment was given to the advocates for the parties through a virtual session via Microsoft teams on 25.6.2020. In light of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and following the practice directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice dated 17th March, 2020 and published in the Kenya Gazette of 17th April 2020 as Gazette Notice no.3137, this Judgment has been delivered to the parties by electronic mail. They are deemed to have waived compliance with order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court.
HON. LUCY N. MBUGUA
ELC JUDGE

Document Summary

Below is the summary preview of this document.

  • Republic-v-District-Land-Adjudication-and-Settlement-Officer-DLASO-Tigania-East-Subcounty-Exparte-Solomon-Kubai-Mugwika-Peter-Kaburuto-Kinathi-Interested-Party-[2020]-eKLR_581_0.jpg

This is the end of the summary preview.

Related Documents

View all summaries